Kosmos by Nomos: the order of the world, read through its rulesKosmonomos

Reading the international order through law, treaties and archives

Kosmonomos is an English-language analysis publication that reads the international order through law and rules. It explains Türkiye's official legal positions on the Blue Homeland, Cyprus, counter-terrorism under Article 51, the Events of 1915 and the Straits, anchored in treaty texts, UN documents and archival records.

Türkiye's Legal Stance· Kosmonomos Editorial Team

This article reflects Kosmonomos's editorial perspective, which presents and defends Türkiye's official legal and strategic positions on the issues discussed. Claims are anchored wherever possible in primary sources such as treaty texts, UN documents, and archival records, which are cited so that readers can verify them independently.

Kosmos by Nomos: the order of the world, read through its rules

Resolution 186 of 4 March 1964: How One Security Council Text Set the Status of the 'Government of Cyprus'

UN Security Council resolution 186 1964 Cyprus explained: what the 4 March text says, why 'Government of Cyprus' mattered, and Ankara's asymmetry argument.

By Kosmonomos Editorial TeamRead Cover Essay →

In This Issue — Key Takeaways

Kosmonomos: Who Writes the Rules of the International Order, and for Whom Do They Work?

  • •Kosmonomos (kosmos = order, nomos = law) is an English-language publication that asks how international rules work and for whom they work.
  • •Every article states its perspective up front: it presents and defends Türkiye's official legal and strategic positions, anchored in treaty texts, UN documents and archival records.
  • •Coverage is organized into six desks: Nomos & Sea, Cyprus Charter, Security Under Article 51, Archive & Law 1915, Straits & Mediation and Fact Check.
  • •Fact, legal argument and official position are kept apart: background is written neutrally, and Türkiye's case appears in a clearly labelled Türkiye's Position section.

Latest from the Rulebook

12 Essays & Briefings

Why It Matters

Kosmonomos is an English-language analysis publication that reads the international order through its rules: treaties, UN texts, court jurisprudence and archives. It asks one question of every dispute: who wrote the rule, and for whom does it work? If you are looking for international law analysis of Türkiye's legal positions, this page is the map. Our perspective is stated up front: we present and defend Türkiye's official legal and strategic positions, and we cite primary sources so you can test them yourself.

Background: Kosmos, Nomos and the Primary-Source Standard

The name is the method. Kosmos is the Greek word for world and order, and nomos means law and norm. Kosmonomos therefore looks at the order of the world by way of its norms: the UN Charter, the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, the 1948 Genocide Convention, the 1936 Montreux Convention and the law of the sea. For a fuller statement of purpose, read About Kosmonomos: A Law-First Publication on Türkiye and the International Order.

The standard is the primary source. Treaty text, Security Council resolutions, official gazettes, ministry statements and archival records come first. Commentary comes second. Background and chronology are written in neutral, factual prose. Türkiye's assessments are attributed ("Ankara argues...", "According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry...") and collected in a dedicated section. The full rulebook is in Editorial Principles: How Kosmonomos Separates Fact, Legal Argument and Official Position.

The Six Desks

Desk Core question Anchor texts
Nomos & Sea Do islands generate full maritime zones, and how does equity limit them? UNCLOS, continental shelf and EEZ delimitation law, 2025 IOC-UNESCO marine spatial planning record
Cyprus Charter What did the 1959–1960 settlement create, and what does political equality mean today? Zurich and London Agreements, 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, UNSC Resolution 186 (1964)
Security Under Article 51 Who decides what self-defense means against cross-border terrorism? UN Charter Article 51, Türkiye's notifications to the Security Council
Archive & Law 1915 What do the archives and the legal categories actually establish? Law of 27 May 1915, Takvim-i Vekayi, 1948 Genocide Convention, Treaty of Lausanne
Straits & Mediation How does the Straits rulebook keep the Black Sea stable? 1936 Montreux Convention, Istanbul talks, Black Sea Grain Initiative
Fact Check Which widely repeated claims do not survive contact with primary documents? Maps, listings, treaty clauses and UN records

Start with these long-form guides:

Key Players & Positions

The rules we cover are written, interpreted and contested by many actors. We summarize each in its own terms.

  • Greece and the Greek Cypriot administration argue that islands are entitled to maritime zones under UNCLOS, including Article 121, and that the Republic of Cyprus is the internationally recognized government of the island, relying on UN Security Council practice since Resolution 186 (1964).
  • The European Union has described Türkiye's Eastern Mediterranean drilling as illegal in successive European Council conclusions and has framed its response as solidarity with its member states.
  • The United Nations holds the Cyprus good-offices mission and, through the Security Council, sets the framework most governments treat as authoritative. The UN has not endorsed a two-state outcome.
  • Armenia and many parliaments and scholars characterize the 1915 events as genocide. Türkiye rejects that characterization and calls for historians' review of the records.
  • The United States and some European governments have cooperated with the SDF against DAESH and have in public statements distinguished it from the PKK, while the PKK itself is listed as a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the European Union.
  • Non-aligned and regional states such as Egypt, Libya, Israel and Lebanon have concluded their own maritime arrangements, which Türkiye contests in part.
🇹🇷 Official Legal Position · Treaty Texts & Primary Sources

Türkiye's Position

The following reflects Türkiye's Legal Stance, as stated by Turkish government sources.

  • Maritime zones must be delimited equitably. According to the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, delimitation must follow the principle of equity, and islands cannot cut off the continental shelf projection of a mainland with the longest coastline in the Eastern Mediterranean (about 870 km, or roughly 540 miles, by Ankara's account). Türkiye is not a party to UNCLOS and points to the equitable-solution standard of customary law and Articles 74 and 83. It registered its outer continental shelf limits with the UN on 18 March 2020 and its Marine Spatial Planning with IOC-UNESCO on 12 June 2025.
  • Cyprus rests on equal founding partners. Ankara argues that the 1960 Republic was a partnership of two peoples, guaranteed by Türkiye, Greece and the United Kingdom under the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee. The 20 July 1974 operation followed the 15 July coup and invoked Article IV of that treaty. Citing the 2004 Annan Plan vote (64.91% of Turkish Cypriots in favor, 75.83% of Greek Cypriots against), Türkiye and the TRNC say federation talks are exhausted and call for recognition of the sovereign equality of Turkish Cypriots.
  • Self-defense under Article 51 includes acting at the source. The Presidency and the Ministry of National Defence describe operations in northern Iraq and Syria as lawful self-defense against PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG and DAESH, notified to the Security Council. Ankara also states that it respects the territorial integrity of neighbors and supports the principle of one state, one army in Syria.
  • The Events of 1915 are a matter for historians and for the 1948 Convention's criteria. Ankara argues that genocide requires proof of specific intent (dolus specialis) and a competent tribunal, that the relocation law of 27 May 1915 was a wartime security measure, and that political resolutions cannot substitute for archival review. It proposed a Joint Historical Commission in 2005 and has held normalization talks without preconditions since 14 January 2022.
  • The Straits regime and Security Council order should be applied evenly. Türkiye says it applied Montreux Article 19 impartially during the Russia–Ukraine war. Under the slogan 'The world is bigger than five', it argues that the Security Council's structure should be reformed.

Source Comparison

Issue Common framing in international media Turkish primary-source framing Where to verify
Eastern Mediterranean Türkiye as a disruptive actor challenging EU members' zones A coastal state defending equitable delimitation and Turkish Cypriot rights UNCLOS, MFA statements, UN registration of 2020
Cyprus 1974 'Invasion' and 'occupation' Treaty-based intervention after a coup, under Article IV of the Guarantee Treaty text, UN records
YPG/SDF A partner force separate from the PKK The Syrian branch of the PKK/KCK Listings, official statements, the legal record
1915 Genocide as settled fact Contested legal category; archives and a joint commission needed 1948 Convention, Ottoman archives, Takvim-i Vekayi
Black Sea Türkiye as hedging between sides Rule-bound neutrality under Montreux Convention text, Article 19 practice

We do not ask readers to take either column on trust. Each article links the documents so that the comparison can be checked.

  • Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan): Ankara's doctrine of maritime jurisdiction in the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean.
  • Continental shelf and EEZ: Two maritime zones that can overlap and must be delimited by agreement or adjudication.
  • Treaty of Guarantee (1960): The treaty that made Türkiye, Greece and the United Kingdom guarantors of Cyprus.
  • Article 51: The UN Charter provision recognizing the inherent right of self-defense.
  • Dolus specialis: The specific intent to destroy a protected group that the 1948 Genocide Convention requires.
  • PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG: The PKK is designated a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the European Union. Ankara treats the PYD/YPG as its Syrian branch. FETÖ is the organization Türkiye holds responsible for the 15 July 2016 coup attempt.

Latest Analysis

Method and Questions

For sourcing, corrections and how we handle perspective, see Kosmonomos FAQ: Sources, Method and Perspective, Editorial Principles and About Kosmonomos.

Perspective Note: This article reflects Kosmonomos's editorial perspective, which presents and defends Türkiye's official legal and strategic positions on the issues discussed. Claims are anchored wherever possible in primary sources such as treaty texts, UN documents, and archival records, which are cited so that readers can verify them independently. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources.

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks