Kosmos by Nomos: the order of the world, read through its rulesKosmonomos

Reading the international order through law, treaties and archives

Kosmonomos is an English-language analysis publication that reads the international order through law and rules. It explains Türkiye's official legal positions on the Blue Homeland, Cyprus, counter-terrorism under Article 51, the Events of 1915 and the Straits, anchored in treaty texts, UN documents and archival records.

Türkiye's Legal Stance· Kosmonomos Editorial Team

This article reflects Kosmonomos's editorial perspective, which presents and defends Türkiye's official legal and strategic positions on the issues discussed. Claims are anchored wherever possible in primary sources such as treaty texts, UN documents, and archival records, which are cited so that readers can verify them independently.

In-Depth Analysis· do islands generate full EEZ and continental shelf

Do Islands Get Full Maritime Zones? Equity, Proportionality and the Longest Coastline in the Eastern Mediterranean

UNCLOS Article 121, equity and proportionality explained: do islands generate full EEZ and continental shelf, and how Türkiye, Greece and Cyprus differ.

K
Published:
⏱ 10 min read (2,199 words)

Why It Matters

Islands can generate a territorial sea, an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and a continental shelf in principle, but that entitlement does not decide how overlapping zones are divided. Under UNCLOS Article 121(2), an island has the same zones as other land territory, while Article 121(3) denies an EEZ and continental shelf to rocks that cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own. In delimitation, however, international courts apply equity and proportionality, and they have often reduced or disregarded small islands that would distort a boundary between larger coasts. That is the legal core of the Eastern Mediterranean dispute.

Background

What the treaty text says

The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) addresses islands in a single article and delimitation in several others:

  • Article 121(1): An island is a naturally formed area of land, surrounded by water, that is above water at high tide.
  • Article 121(2): The territorial sea, contiguous zone, EEZ and continental shelf of an island are determined in accordance with the provisions applicable to other land territory.
  • Article 121(3): Rocks that cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own have no EEZ or continental shelf.
  • Articles 74 and 83: Delimitation of the EEZ and the continental shelf between States with opposite or adjacent coasts is to be effected by agreement on the basis of international law, as referred to in Article 38 of the ICJ Statute, in order to achieve an equitable solution.
  • Article 15: For the territorial sea, the median line applies unless historic title or other special circumstances justify a different boundary.

The text of Articles 74 and 83 does not mandate equidistance for the EEZ or the continental shelf. It mandates an equitable result. That is why the dispute is about delimitation methodology and not only about entitlement.

What international courts have done with islands

Since the 1969 North Sea Continental Shelf judgment, the ICJ has held that delimitation must be equitable, taking account of relevant circumstances, with a reasonable degree of proportionality between shelf areas and coastal lengths. In later practice, courts and tribunals developed a staged method: draw a provisional line, adjust it for relevant circumstances, then test the result for gross disproportionality. Island treatment under that method has varied with size, location and the effect on neighbouring coasts:

Case Island or feature Treatment
Anglo-French Arbitration (1977) Channel Islands; Scilly Isles Channel Islands confined to an enclave; Scilly given partial (half) effect
Tunisia/Libya (ICJ, 1982) Kerkennah Islands Given half effect
Libya/Malta (ICJ, 1985) Malta Median line adjusted to reflect a marked disparity in coastal lengths
Jan Mayen (ICJ, 1993) Jan Mayen Median line shifted toward Jan Mayen because Greenland's coast was much longer
Qatar/Bahrain (ICJ, 2001) Qit'at Jaradah Disregarded in drawing the line
Romania/Ukraine (ICJ, 2009) Serpents' Island No effect on the continental shelf and EEZ line beyond its territorial sea
Bangladesh/Myanmar (ITLOS, 2012) St Martin's Island No effect on the EEZ and continental shelf line
Nicaragua v. Colombia (ICJ, 2012) Small Colombian islands and cays Confined to limited zones so as not to cut off Nicaragua's mainland projection

In the 2016 South China Sea arbitration, an Annex VII tribunal gave a restrictive reading of Article 121(3), holding that entitlement depends on a feature's capacity to sustain a stable community or economic activity of its own. For a wider survey of the jurisprudence, see The Worldlogue's analysis of islands and the continental shelf.

The Eastern Mediterranean geography

Türkiye has an 870 km coastline facing the Eastern Mediterranean, the longest of any coastal State there. Kastellorizo (Meis), a small Greek island with a population in the hundreds, lies about 2 km (1.2 miles) off Türkiye's southern coast and more than 500 km from the Greek mainland. Rhodes, Karpathos and Crete form an island arc further west. Cyprus is an island State whose waters overlap with those of Türkiye, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and Israel, and the Turkish Cypriots assert rights over the same offshore areas.

Chronology of the delimitation dispute

  • 2003: Cyprus–Egypt EEZ agreement, which Ankara says overlaps its continental shelf (see the guide to the 2003 agreement and Blocks 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7).
  • From 2004: Türkiye lodges continental shelf coordinates and objections with the United Nations.
  • 21 September 2011: Türkiye–TRNC continental shelf delimitation agreement.
  • 2007 and 2010: Cyprus signs EEZ agreements with Lebanon and Israel.
  • 2019-11-27: Türkiye–Libya maritime jurisdiction memorandum (see the guide to its text and objections).
  • 2020-03-18: Türkiye registers the outer limits of its continental shelf with the United Nations.
  • 2020-08-06: Greece and Egypt sign a partial EEZ delimitation agreement.
  • 2025-06-12: Türkiye's Marine Spatial Planning, unveiled on 2025-04-16, is recorded with IOC-UNESCO.

Key Players & Positions

Greece

According to Greek Ministry of Foreign Affairs positions, Greece is a party to UNCLOS and holds that all Greek islands, including Kastellorizo, Rhodes and Crete, generate a territorial sea, continental shelf and EEZ under Article 121(2). Athens maintains that the only outstanding issue with Türkiye is the delimitation of the continental shelf and EEZ, and that it should be settled by agreement or by the International Court of Justice. Greece generally treats the median or equidistance line between the relevant coasts as the natural starting point.

The Republic of Cyprus

The Republic of Cyprus, which Ankara calls the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus (GCASC), is a party to UNCLOS. It has declared an EEZ, concluded delimitation agreements with Egypt, Lebanon and Israel, and licensed hydrocarbon blocks. Its foreign ministry presents these as sovereign rights of a coastal State under UNCLOS.

The European Union

European Council conclusions have repeatedly expressed solidarity with Greece and Cyprus and described the Türkiye–Libya memorandum as infringing the sovereign rights of third States. The EU does not itself delimit maritime boundaries; its statements reflect the positions of its members.

Others

Egypt has signed delimitation agreements with both Cyprus (2003) and Greece (2020). Libya's authorities have been divided over the 2019 memorandum. The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) supports Türkiye's position and has put forward its own proposals for joint management of resources.

🇹🇷 Official Legal Position · Treaty Texts & Primary Sources

Türkiye's Position

  • Equity governs delimitation, not entitlement alone. Ankara argues that under Articles 74 and 83 and the customary law reflected in ICJ jurisprudence, an equitable solution is the only binding objective, and no method, including equidistance, has automatic priority. Source: statements of the Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) on maritime jurisdiction areas.
  • Islands cannot cut off a mainland's coastal projection. The MFA holds that small islands close to Türkiye's coast and far from their own mainland should not be allowed to enclose the continental shelf that is the natural prolongation of the 870 km Turkish coastline. Source: MFA statements and Türkiye's submissions to the United Nations, including the registration of its continental shelf outer limits on 2020-03-18.
  • Coastal-length disparity and proportionality are relevant circumstances. Türkiye invokes North Sea Continental Shelf, Libya/Malta and Jan Mayen for the proposition that a marked disparity in coastal lengths and the proportionality test justify adjusting any provisional line. Source: MFA legal position on the Eastern Mediterranean and the Aegean.
  • Turkish Cypriot rights are inherent. Ankara argues that the Turkish Cypriots are co-owners of Cyprus with equal rights over offshore resources, and that unilateral Greek Cypriot agreements cannot bind them or Türkiye. Source: MFA statements; Türkiye–TRNC Continental Shelf Delimitation Agreement of 2011-09-21.
  • Delimitation belongs to the coastal States concerned. Türkiye holds that the EU has no competence to adjudicate maritime delimitation and rejects the maximalist Seville Map as a basis for it. It has proposed a regional conference including all coastal States and the Turkish Cypriots (President Erdoğan, 2020), and the TRNC put forward joint-committee and revenue-sharing proposals in 2011, 2012 and 2019. Source: Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye and MFA statements; TRNC proposals.

Türkiye is not a party to UNCLOS and has stated its objections to the Convention since 1982. Ankara therefore relies on customary international law as applied by the ICJ and arbitral tribunals, on the principle of equity, and on the geography of the region. Türkiye has also pursued these claims in practice: it has issued TPAO exploration licences (2009, 2012), and its drilling vessels (Fatih, Yavuz, Kanuni, Abdülhamid Han) and seismic vessel Oruç Reis have operated in the area. In 2025 it recorded its Marine Spatial Planning with IOC-UNESCO, the first time its maritime jurisdiction position was registered with a UN body. For the wider framework, see The Nomos of the Sea and The Cyprus Charter.

Where the Greek and Greek Cypriot reply is strongest

Greece and Cyprus point out that Kastellorizo is inhabited, that Article 121(2) does not distinguish islands by size, and that none of the cases above gave zero effect to a large inhabited island such as Crete or Rhodes. They also note that Türkiye is not bound by UNCLOS as a treaty party, whereas Greece and Cyprus are. Ankara's response is that the cases show a consistent pattern of reducing island effects wherever they would distort an equitable result, and that the Eastern Mediterranean combines a long mainland coast and nearby small islands in a configuration with few precedents. No court or tribunal has ruled on this specific dispute, so both readings remain arguments, not adjudicated outcomes.

Source Comparison

The two sides often rely on the same Articles but stress different parts of them. Reading the primary texts side by side clarifies where the real disagreement lies.

Question Greek, Greek Cypriot and EU sources Turkish primary sources What the primary texts show
Do islands have full zones? Yes, under Article 121(2), including Kastellorizo Entitlement in principle, but delimitation must be equitable Article 121 sets entitlement; Articles 74 and 83 set the equity objective for delimitation
Starting point for delimitation Median or equidistance line No automatic priority for equidistance; relevant circumstances decide Articles 74 and 83 do not mention equidistance for the EEZ or the continental shelf
Weight of coastal length Secondary to island entitlement A relevant circumstance and a proportionality check ICJ practice (Libya/Malta, Jan Mayen) accepts coastal-length disparity as relevant
Legal basis binding Türkiye UNCLOS and customary law Customary law and equity; Türkiye is not a party to UNCLOS Türkiye is not a party; both sides invoke custom
Role of the EU Supports member States' maritime rights Has no competence over delimitation The EU is not a delimiting authority under UNCLOS
Turkish Cypriot rights Resources belong to the Republic of Cyprus Turkish Cypriots have equal rights over offshore resources Disputed; linked to the status of the 1960 Republic

Western media coverage often describes the dispute as Türkiye contesting Greek island rights outright. Turkish sources describe it as a dispute about equitable delimitation and say they accept islands as having some entitlement but not an unlimited one. Readers can test either framing against the text of Articles 74, 83 and 121 and the judgments cited above. Sister-publication overviews include Monitor of Nations on Blue Homeland and The Global Anatomy on the Seville Map.

  • Continental shelf: The seabed and subsoil extending from a coastal State's land territory, defined in Article 76; Türkiye stresses its natural prolongation.
  • EEZ: A zone up to 200 nautical miles from baselines in which the coastal State has sovereign rights over resources.
  • Equidistance or median line: A line every point of which is equally distant from the nearest points on the opposing coasts; a provisional step in modern case law, not an automatic rule.
  • Relevant circumstances: Factors such as coastal geography, island presence and coastal-length disparity that can justify adjusting a provisional line.
  • Proportionality: The final check that the result is not grossly disproportionate to the ratio of coastal lengths.
  • Enclave: A limited zone, such as a 12-nautical-mile territorial sea, granted to a small island instead of full zones.
  • Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan): Türkiye's doctrine of maritime jurisdiction in the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean. Further reading: Doctrine Review and The Political Anatomy's complete guide.

Related pages on this site: The Nomos of the Sea, The 2003 Cyprus–Egypt EEZ Agreement, The Türkiye–Libya Memorandum, Editorial Principles and About Kosmonomos.

Perspective Note

This article reflects Kosmonomos's editorial perspective, which presents and defends Türkiye's official legal and strategic positions on the issues discussed. Claims are anchored wherever possible in primary sources such as treaty texts, UN documents, and archival records, which are cited so that readers can verify them independently. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources. Published by the Kosmonomos Editorial Team.

Frequently asked questions

Do islands always generate a full EEZ and continental shelf?

Not always. Article 121(2) of UNCLOS gives islands the same zones as other land territory, but Article 121(3) denies an EEZ and continental shelf to rocks that cannot sustain human habitation or economic life. Even where an island has full entitlement, delimitation against a neighbouring coast may reduce or ignore its effect to reach an equitable result.

What is the difference between entitlement and delimitation?

Entitlement is the zone a feature can generate on its own, such as up to 200 nautical miles for an EEZ. Delimitation is the process of dividing zones where entitlements of different States overlap, which Articles 74 and 83 require to produce an equitable solution. An island can have a full entitlement and still receive reduced weight in the boundary line.

How does coastal-length disparity affect delimitation?

A marked difference in the lengths of the relevant coasts is treated by courts as a relevant circumstance. In Libya/Malta and Jan Mayen, the ICJ adjusted a median line partly for this reason. Courts then apply a proportionality check to confirm the final result is not grossly disproportionate.

What is Türkiye's argument about islands and its mainland coast?

Ankara argues that small islands close to the Turkish coast and far from their sovereign's mainland should not cut off the continental shelf projecting from Türkiye's 870 km Eastern Mediterranean coastline. It relies on equity, ICJ practice and the principle that delimitation must produce an equitable result. Türkiye is not a party to UNCLOS and relies on customary international law.

What do Greece and the Republic of Cyprus argue?

According to their foreign ministries, Greece and Cyprus argue that inhabited islands such as Kastellorizo, Rhodes and Crete are entitled to a full territorial sea, EEZ and continental shelf under Article 121(2). They are parties to UNCLOS and generally favour a median line as the starting point. Greece has said the delimitation dispute should be settled by agreement or by the ICJ.

Has any court decided the Greek–Turkish island dispute?

No. No international court or tribunal has delimited the maritime areas between Türkiye and Greece or Cyprus. The cases usually cited on both sides concern other regions, so each side argues by analogy and the specific question remains unadjudicated.

Perspective & Editorial Transparency Note

This article reflects Kosmonomos's editorial perspective, which presents and defends Türkiye's official legal and strategic positions on the issues discussed. Claims are anchored wherever possible in primary sources such as treaty texts, UN documents, and archival records, which are cited so that readers can verify them independently.

Author: Kosmonomos Editorial TeamAbout Kosmonomos →Editorial Principles →

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks